Friday, January 31, 2014
Tumblr and White Privilege: Who are we defining?
I Want To Be Wanded: Ways to Divest Your Privilege
In this moment, our friend faced a weighty decision: 1) proceed inside for her night of partying without challenging the security guard on his racial-discrimination that privileged her and her whiteness, or 2) insist on being treated the same as the non-white patrons who were subjected to increased security measures because their skin colors are associated with "danger."
She chose the second option. In doing so, our friend acknowledged the less obvious component of white privilege that McIntosh discusses in her piece that we read for class. McIntosh explains how privileged individuals (whites, males, heterosexuals, able-bodied individuals, middle-class folks, etc.) can usually acknowledge the ways in which others are disadvantaged without realizing that they are overadvantaged. It would have been "easier" for our friend to walk into the bar and think, "Wow, those people are being profiled because they are black. That shouldn't happen." McIntosh suggests that this thought-process is all to common. She writes, "Whites are taught to think of their lives as morally neutral, normative, and average, and also ideal, so that when we work to benefit others, this is seen as work that will allow 'them' to be more like 'us'," (63). Instead, our friend pushed back against the privileged status society was (and always is) trying to confer on her whiteness by telling the security guard, "I want to be wanded. I'm packin' and I need to be wanded." By insisting she be treated by the same standards, she worked to weaken her own white privilege while simultaneously creating a space where power could be shared more equitably. If individual whites insist on receiving the same security treatment, for example, they can work to eliminate the idea that "blackness = dangerous/guilty" AND the idea that "whiteness = safe/innocent." Both components are necessary to combat oppression/privilege.
During our discussion of this incident in class, several students suggested that our white, female friend might not have been willing to give up her white privilege in that moment had she actually been carrying a weapon. I can concede that yes, this might have been true and is probably the case with many guilty persons who avoid punishment because of their white privilege. However, their support of the status quo does not render this tactic unsuccessful. Those individuals should still insist on being subjected to the same "profiling" and should suffer the consequences that a member of a nonwhite race would suffer if she/he is caught. This might not be practical, but radical steps must be taken to dismantle the master's house.
"A Man with Balls": Possibly the Worst Title of Anything Ever
When Speaking Up is Speaking Over
This week in class, we discussed privilege and the question of what to do with it. The two answers we came up with were either finding ways to sacrifice it or using it to make a better world for those we have privilege over.
I find that the second option can be problematic. For instance, many people discuss Muslim women wearing head coverings whether they are feminist or not. There have been so many debates and but rarely are Muslim women asked about what they think – they are cut out of a conversation about their own lives. In a British Empire history class I took freshman year, we read about suttee in colonial India, but we never read any first hand accounts from widows, only from “white men [who talked about] saving brown women from brown men." These men who wrote accounts of sati, and white feminists who talk about how oppressed hibjabis are, and Macklemore, who sings about how hip-hop hates gay people, without acknowledging LGBTQ rappers like Angel Haze and Le1f, are all speaking over marginalized groups of which they are not a part. Using privilege in this way, to speak “for” a group, is dangerous because it is easy to misrepresent desires from that group or individuals in it.
So the question remains, what should you do with your privilege? I think this video of Dr. Joy DeGruy gives a good example. In the video she talks about going to the grocery store with her sister-in-law, who passes as white, and whose check is not scrutinized at the register. When Dr. DeGruy comes up to the register after her and pays with a check, she is asked for two pieces of identification, and the cashier searches for her name in the registry of people who have written bad checks. Her sister-in-law steps in, using her white (passing) privilege, to call attention to the injustice of the situation. In that moment, she used her white privilege to make everyone else in the immediate area aware of something that might otherwise have gone unnoticed. This example isn’t quite sacrificing your privilege and asking the cashier to look at your identification, and it’s not using your privilege to try to effect major societal change. I believe this use of privilege is more effective at getting others to be aware of microaggressions and racism than sacrificing everyday privileges because it reaches a wider audience and draws attention directly to the problem.
On Solidarity
Furthermore, if feminism is an expansive checklist of different issues, then how do we decide our priorities while being sensitive to other groups? For example, some point out mainstream rap lyrics’ rampant sexism. They cringe when Childish Gambino raps “Half Thai thickie/All she wanna do is Bangkok” or Kendrick Lamar states “See my standards are pampered by threesomes tomorrow” or any suggestion of shaking ass for the heterosexual male gaze – and rightfully so in that women’s bodies become a vehicle for men to achieve masculinity -- however, people’s prioritization of this to the exclusion of discussing the sexism inherent in other predominantly white lyricists suggests a racist notion and an assumption that could marginalize people of color. Another instance occurs with class differences; for example, as Jezebel blogger Ninjacate points out, many feminists “cheekily denounce ‘twitter feminism’ as useless, without considering that twitter is the main medium through which less economically privileged women (usually women of colour) can put their feminism into practice.” To use a more personal example, as a white male, I often wonder if my speaking out in class – even in a class focused on sexism and where my contribution would hopefully further this conversation -- is itself a function of my white, male privilege and whether or not utilizing thator divesting it would be better. In some sense, my constant discussion seems to contribute to networks of oppression.
White Privilege in a RAV4
Twitter Privilege
I have included links to some of my favorite feminist writers on Twitter, who you should all definitely check out. They speak on a variety of different issues but all have extremely interesting things to say about privilege.
Sex v. Gender and Men Trying to Guess Bra Prices
Once upon a time...
I will be seeing Frozen for the second time in theaters tonight. And I am not ashamed to tell you this. My two favorite movies (probably ever) are Tangled and now Frozen. Why do I like this movie so much? One, because it is a great sister movie: having a younger biological sister and 177 sorority sisters, I really like the message. Two, it is different from the other Disney films. Tangled, Allendra Letsome, NOW Vice President of Membership says, was Disney “taking baby steps on the path to feminism.” Now, with Frozen we take a few more baby steps toward feminism. Exalted as a progressive film by Gina Luttrell of PolicyMic, Frozen also tackles social issues of sexual orientation along with sexism. I don’t want to give too much away, but if you’ve already seen it (or don’t plan to) here’s the article (SPOLIER ALERT). At the very least, it passes the Bechdel test.