A helpful way of understanding just how artificial gender
performances are is to examine the way they manifest themselves
cross-culturally. The different ways in
which we are each enculturated greatly impact the way we view our experience of
our own bodies.
My experiences in India spoke greatly to this. While I was on a train, a woman who was wearing
a sari roughly tapped me. She clapped
her hands and stuck them out and forcefully beckoned to me, clearly waiting for
me to give her money. As I looked
closer, I saw that her features were very traditionally masculine. As I watched him/her continue on down the row
of seats to each person and repeat the same clapping and demand, I was
surprised to see many people reach in their pockets hand him/her some
money. Often, I had seen people wave
beggars away, but these people were not as dismissive of this particular
beggar. I asked my neighbor about this
phenomenon, and he explained to me that this person was a hijra: a man-woman
who begged to make money. It is
inauspicious to refuse them. The man
seemed derisive, so I did not pursue the topic further with him.
Later, in my psychological anthropology class, we were
invited to examine a cultural phenomenon of our choice, and I decided to study
hijras. I discovered that they are born
biologically male, and choose to remove their penis and testes in order to
become sexless. They often live in
communities with other hijras, but some live alone or with partners. Their origin is found in Hindu scriptures, in
a creation story, and although they are sworn to be celibate, many become
prostitutes to earn a living. This is
what fascinated me most about studying hijras is the idea that other religions
than Christianity allow for much more fluid gender identities than simply “Adam
and Eve” male and female binaries. In
Hindu stories, the gods switch between the genders, as they desire. This leaves space for people like hijras, who
consider themselves to be neither male nor female. Often people are confused about this
identification. They wear women’s clothing;
so many assume that they are attempting to become female. In fact, this ambiguity allows them to behave
in ways that Indian women would be punished for. For example, some particularly mischievous
hijras will flash their genital area to offending individuals. This bodily exposure would not be tolerated from
a female, but since they are not females, they often get away with it. In this way, they make a commentary about the
rigid sexual taboos that Indian women often face. This is not to say that they
do not face their own persecution. They
are harassed and abused by other Indians for being different for the norm.
I wanted to ask the class a few things: Why do you think
that modern Indian society has such a strong dislike of hijras? Why do you think they fear them so
deeply? Are there any passages of
Christian text that support gender fluidity and reject binaries?
Just wanted to cite my source for the information in the
second paragraph:
Nanda,
Serena. Neither Man nor Woman: The Hijras of India. Belmont, CA:
Wadsworth Pub., 1990. Print.
Annika,
ReplyDeleteThanks for sharing!! I think this is a really neat example of how gender is performed. But I think it also points to something else: the limitations of performance's affect on social perception. While we have studied the impact of performance, and learned that virtually all aspects of interrelational dynamics are performance based, here we see an example where performance of the individual does not, and will never, be performed to the extent that they are socially passing via that performance. I wonder if the purpose of the hijra is to embody and demonstrate that performance is a central facet, and if the imperfect representation they perform is a critique of gender binary at its fullest extent. The Hindu gods and goddesses that presented in a multitude of gendered forms according to whim also point to a critique of gender binary and norms that in turn provides the cultural basis for gender boundaries. It is interesting, then, to notice that the cultural religion, a country-wide official religion none-the-less, does not elucidate any strict and unyielding boundaries for gender role performance, but the society created one anyway. I think that, as a result, the Indian society has such a strong dislike of hijras for the same reason prejudices exist in America and other patriarchal societies against trans-gender and trans-sexual individuals.
As for the passages in the Christian texts that supports gender fluidity, they absolutely exist. There has recently been a lot of work in the area of biblical queer-criticism which seeks entirely to explore such concepts.
-E
Genesis 18-19
ReplyDeleteJudges 19-21
Romans 1
Leviticus 18:22, 20:13
just in case you want to take a look.
-E
Those are generally about homosexuality, traditionally read in a negative light, but most queer criticism are taking these traditional passages and offering more fluid, positive, historical analyses.
ReplyDeleteThis is a verse on trans-sexuality/trans-gender....Deuteronomy 22:5. also negative.
ReplyDelete