Friday, February 14, 2014

Hijras


A helpful way of understanding just how artificial gender performances are is to examine the way they manifest themselves cross-culturally.  The different ways in which we are each enculturated greatly impact the way we view our experience of our own bodies.

My experiences in India spoke greatly to this.  While I was on a train, a woman who was wearing a sari roughly tapped me.  She clapped her hands and stuck them out and forcefully beckoned to me, clearly waiting for me to give her money.  As I looked closer, I saw that her features were very traditionally masculine.  As I watched him/her continue on down the row of seats to each person and repeat the same clapping and demand, I was surprised to see many people reach in their pockets hand him/her some money.  Often, I had seen people wave beggars away, but these people were not as dismissive of this particular beggar.  I asked my neighbor about this phenomenon, and he explained to me that this person was a hijra: a man-woman who begged to make money.  It is inauspicious to refuse them.  The man seemed derisive, so I did not pursue the topic further with him. 

Later, in my psychological anthropology class, we were invited to examine a cultural phenomenon of our choice, and I decided to study hijras.  I discovered that they are born biologically male, and choose to remove their penis and testes in order to become sexless.  They often live in communities with other hijras, but some live alone or with partners.  Their origin is found in Hindu scriptures, in a creation story, and although they are sworn to be celibate, many become prostitutes to earn a living.  This is what fascinated me most about studying hijras is the idea that other religions than Christianity allow for much more fluid gender identities than simply “Adam and Eve” male and female binaries.  In Hindu stories, the gods switch between the genders, as they desire.  This leaves space for people like hijras, who consider themselves to be neither male nor female.  Often people are confused about this identification.  They wear women’s clothing; so many assume that they are attempting to become female.  In fact, this ambiguity allows them to behave in ways that Indian women would be punished for.  For example, some particularly mischievous hijras will flash their genital area to offending individuals.  This bodily exposure would not be tolerated from a female, but since they are not females, they often get away with it.  In this way, they make a commentary about the rigid sexual taboos that Indian women often face. This is not to say that they do not face their own persecution.  They are harassed and abused by other Indians for being different for the norm. 

I wanted to ask the class a few things: Why do you think that modern Indian society has such a strong dislike of hijras?  Why do you think they fear them so deeply?  Are there any passages of Christian text that support gender fluidity and reject binaries?  

Just wanted to cite my source for the information in the second paragraph:
Nanda, Serena. Neither Man nor Woman: The Hijras of India. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Pub., 1990. Print.

4 comments:

  1. Annika,

    Thanks for sharing!! I think this is a really neat example of how gender is performed. But I think it also points to something else: the limitations of performance's affect on social perception. While we have studied the impact of performance, and learned that virtually all aspects of interrelational dynamics are performance based, here we see an example where performance of the individual does not, and will never, be performed to the extent that they are socially passing via that performance. I wonder if the purpose of the hijra is to embody and demonstrate that performance is a central facet, and if the imperfect representation they perform is a critique of gender binary at its fullest extent. The Hindu gods and goddesses that presented in a multitude of gendered forms according to whim also point to a critique of gender binary and norms that in turn provides the cultural basis for gender boundaries. It is interesting, then, to notice that the cultural religion, a country-wide official religion none-the-less, does not elucidate any strict and unyielding boundaries for gender role performance, but the society created one anyway. I think that, as a result, the Indian society has such a strong dislike of hijras for the same reason prejudices exist in America and other patriarchal societies against trans-gender and trans-sexual individuals.

    As for the passages in the Christian texts that supports gender fluidity, they absolutely exist. There has recently been a lot of work in the area of biblical queer-criticism which seeks entirely to explore such concepts.

    -E

    ReplyDelete
  2. Genesis 18-19
    Judges 19-21
    Romans 1
    Leviticus 18:22, 20:13

    just in case you want to take a look.

    -E

    ReplyDelete
  3. Those are generally about homosexuality, traditionally read in a negative light, but most queer criticism are taking these traditional passages and offering more fluid, positive, historical analyses.

    ReplyDelete
  4. This is a verse on trans-sexuality/trans-gender....Deuteronomy 22:5. also negative.

    ReplyDelete